Backblaze vs Box
A source-aware comparison of pricing, documented capabilities and workflow fit.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — Backblaze is usage-based pricing, Box is free tier available.
- How to start: Backblaze is usage-based pricing, Box is free tier available.
- Where they differ: only Box has mobile app and sso (saml); both offer public api.
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. How we score tools.
What Backblaze is
Backblaze sells distinct products, most notably B2 Cloud Storage and Computer Backup. B2 is usage-billed always-hot object storage with Native and S3-compatible APIs, browser access and command-line tooling. Current public pricing starts with 10 GB free, then meters byte-hour storage, egress beyond an allowance and selected Class D transactions. Encryption, Object Lock, version history and replication are capabilities to configure—not substitutes for independent access controls and tested recovery.
What Box is
Box stores and shares files with enterprise governance: retention policies, legal holds and detailed permissions. Governance is the product: retention schedules, legal holds and granular permissions are why it appears in regulated procurement. For a small team that just needs shared folders, all of that is cost without benefit.
Side by side
| Backblaze | Box | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Hosting | Productivity |
| How to start | Usage-basednot a monthly price | Free tiernot a monthly price |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | No | Yes |
| Open source / self-hostable | No | No |
| SSO (SAML) | No | Yes |
| Visit | Backblaze ↗ | Box ↗ |
What Backblaze is built to do
- S3-compatible API
- Supports common S3 operations alongside Backblaze's Native API.
- Usage-based storage
- Bills stored bytes over time with separate egress and selected transaction rules.
- Object immutability
- Object Lock and Legal Hold can prevent deletion or change for governed retention periods.
- Encryption and replication
- Offers managed-key or customer-key SSE and configurable bucket replication.
What Box is built to do
- Retention and legal hold
- Applies policy-driven retention and preserves content for litigation.
- Granular permissions
- Sets access at folder and item level with external collaborator control.
- Compliance certifications
- Supports regulated industry requirements and audit reporting.
Choose Backblaze if
- Backup repositories whose software has verified B2 or S3-compatible support
- Media and application objects with modeled storage, download and transaction patterns
- Immutable off-site copies configured with restricted keys, Object Lock and restore drills
Skip Backblaze if
- The workload depends on an untested Amazon S3 feature or exact behavioral parity
- Required data residency, region pairing or recovery throughput is not available and verified
- No owner exists for key rotation, retention, lifecycle, replication and restore testing
Choose Box if
- Regulated organisations that need content governance, not just storage.
Evidence and freshness
Where a claim on this page comes from a vendor page, it is linked here.
Backblaze
Official sources reviewed · reviewed 2026-08-24
Backblaze: pros & cons
- Low-friction object storage: Native and S3-compatible APIs work with many existing backup and application tools.
- Published usage model: Storage, egress allowance, overage and transaction classes are documented publicly.
- Data-protection controls: Optional server-side encryption, Object Lock, version history and bucket replication support resilient designs.
- Egress options: Downloads are free up to three times average monthly storage and through named CDN/compute partners.
- Not all S3 behavior is identical: Compatibility must be checked against the exact SDK, operation and application workflow.
- Encryption is a configuration decision: Official documentation says B2 data is not encrypted by default and offers optional SSE.
- Recovery cost can vary: Large restores may exceed free egress and generate transaction, network and operational costs.
- Product confusion risk: Computer Backup retention and device rules do not describe generic B2 object storage.
Box: pros & cons
- Strong governance and compliance controls
- Granular permissions
- Good audit trails
- Costs more than consumer storage
- Interface is heavier than rivals
- Sync client has a mixed reputation
Our verdict on Backblaze
Backblaze B2 can be cost-effective object storage, but compare the exact workload rather than headline TB pricing; test API compatibility, calculate full restore cost and time, enable appropriate encryption/immutability, and regularly restore independent copies.
Our verdict on Box
Buy it for compliance requirements. For plain file sync it is more than you need.