Caddy vs Selenium
A source-aware comparison of pricing, documented capabilities and workflow fit.
Short answer
- Price: both start at Free.
- How to start: both are free.
- Where they differ: on what we checked they match — both offer public api and open source / self-hostable.
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. How we score tools.
What Caddy is
Caddy is a web server that obtains and renews TLS certificates automatically, with a configuration file most people can read.
What Selenium is
Selenium is an Apache-2.0-licensed open-source browser-automation project comprising WebDriver language bindings, Selenium IDE and Selenium Grid. It controls supported browsers locally or remotely, but it does not itself provide hosted browsers, application-specific test cases, assertions or a complete test runner; teams assemble and operate those surrounding parts.
Side by side
| Caddy | Selenium | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| How to start | Freeverified | Freeverified |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | No | No |
| Open source / self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| SSO (SAML) | No | No |
| Visit | Caddy ↗ | Selenium ↗ |
What Selenium is built to do
- WebDriver
- Controls supported browsers through native browser automation interfaces and language bindings.
- Selenium Grid
- Routes sessions to remote browser instances for parallel and cross-platform execution.
- Selenium IDE
- Records and replays browser actions through supported browser extensions.
- WebDriver BiDi
- Adds bidirectional browser events such as network, console and JavaScript error streams.
Choose Caddy if
- Anyone who wants a correctly configured HTTPS server without ceremony.
Choose Selenium if
- Cross-browser web tests that need supported language bindings and direct browser control
- Teams building their own local or distributed browser-testing infrastructure
- Projects willing to combine Selenium with an assertion library and test runner
Skip Selenium if
- You expect a hosted browser and device cloud to be included
- The team cannot maintain browser drivers, Grid capacity, selectors and synchronization logic
- The primary requirement is native mobile-app automation rather than browser or mobile-web automation
Evidence and freshness
Where a claim on this page comes from a vendor page, it is linked here.
Caddy
Sources have not been attached to this record yet.
Selenium
Official sources reviewed · reviewed 2026-08-24
Caddy: pros & cons
- HTTPS configured correctly by default
- Configuration is short and legible
- Single binary, easy to deploy
- Smaller community than nginx
- Fewer third-party guides
- Some advanced setups need plugins
Selenium: pros & cons
- Standards-based control: WebDriver is a W3C Recommendation implemented with browser-specific drivers.
- Language options: Official downloads list bindings for Java, Python, C#, Ruby, JavaScript and Kotlin.
- Distributed execution: Grid routes WebDriver commands to remote browser instances and supports parallel, cross-platform testing.
- Record and playback: Selenium IDE records browser actions through Chrome, Firefox and Edge extensions.
- Infrastructure not included: Local browsers, remote Grid machines or a separate hosted provider must supply execution capacity.
- Test framework required: Selenium documentation states that assertions and broader test structure come from assertion libraries and test runners.
- Environment maintenance: Browser, driver, language binding and Grid compatibility must be managed across updates.
- UI-change sensitivity: Application locators, timing and workflows still require deliberate test design and maintenance.
Our verdict on Caddy
The easiest path to good TLS defaults. nginx still wins on ecosystem and examples.
Our verdict on Selenium
Choose Selenium for portable browser control and ecosystem flexibility when your team can supply the test framework and infrastructure; compare hosted services if device access and operations matter more than control.