Caspio vs Gitea
A source-aware comparison of pricing, documented capabilities and workflow fit.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — Caspio is from $300/mo, Gitea is pricing not verified.
- How to start: Caspio is from $300/mo, Gitea is pricing not verified.
- Where they differ: only Gitea has open source / self-hostable; both offer public api and sso (saml).
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. How we score tools.
What Caspio is
Caspio is a proprietary hosted low-code platform for building database-backed web applications from tables, forms, reports, charts, authentication and automation components called DataPages and DataParts. Current Team pricing is $300 monthly or $270 per month billed annually; Business is $600 or $540 annual-equivalent, while Enterprise is quote based. Every plan advertises unlimited app users, but platform resources are not unlimited: DataPages, records, logs, file storage, emails, directories, integration calls and document generation have plan allowances, add-on blocks, overage prices and hard upgrade ceilings.
What Gitea is
Gitea is a lightweight, self-hostable Git service with issues, pull requests and CI, running comfortably on modest hardware.
Side by side
What Caspio is built to do
- Visual application builder
- Creates forms, searchable reports, charts and database workflows through DataPages and DataParts.
- Hosted relational data
- Stores application records and files with plan-specific capacity and logging allowances.
- Identity management
- Provides directories, two-factor authentication and optional external SAML app connections.
- Integration surfaces
- Connects external services through REST APIs, webhooks, scheduled import/export and extension agents.
Choose Caspio if
- Forms, portals, directories and workflow apps built around structured records
- Projects needing many end users but predictable builder and resource capacity
- Teams that can pilot DataPage, record, API, storage and compliance needs before selecting a plan
Skip Caspio if
- The application requires full source-code ownership or unrestricted infrastructure control
- The budget cannot absorb record, API, storage or compliance add-ons
- Complex real-time UX, offline-native mobile behavior or unusual database semantics dominate the product
Choose Gitea if
- Teams that want their own Git host without running GitLab.
Evidence and freshness
Where a claim on this page comes from a vendor page, it is linked here.
Caspio
Official sources reviewed · reviewed 2026-08-24
Gitea
Sources have not been attached to this record yet.
Caspio: pros & cons
- Rapid database apps: Visual tables, forms, reports and workflow components shorten conventional CRUD delivery.
- Unlimited application users: Core plans do not use a simple per-end-user subscription model.
- Hosted operations: Caspio provides the application platform, database hosting and deployed web interfaces.
- Published capacity table: Base allowances, prepaid add-ons, overages and plan ceilings are visible before purchase.
- Unlimited users does not mean unlimited resources: Records, DataPages, storage, calls, emails and logs remain metered or capped.
- Meaningful entry price is substantial: Team starts at $300 month-to-month before optional capacity or compliance charges.
- Portability needs planning: Data can be exported, but a complete Caspio application is tied to proprietary DataPages and platform behavior.
- Security and compliance are tiered: Premium identity, audit, HIPAA/BAA, dedicated resources and governance can require higher or special plans.
Gitea: pros & cons
- Runs on very little hardware
- Familiar interface for GitHub users
- Open source with no seat limits
- Fewer features than GitHub or GitLab
- You handle backups and upgrades
- Smaller plugin ecosystem
Our verdict on Caspio
Caspio can deliver conventional data apps quickly and unlimited end users are attractive, but the real unit economics sit in platform resources; prototype the complete workflow, forecast every allowance and overage, and document data plus application exit procedures before committing.
Our verdict on Gitea
The pragmatic self-hosted choice. GitLab does more; Gitea does enough with far less overhead.