Caspio vs Hudson

What Caspio is

Caspio is a proprietary hosted low-code platform for building database-backed web applications from tables, forms, reports, charts, authentication and automation components called DataPages and DataParts. Current Team pricing is $300 monthly or $270 per month billed annually; Business is $600 or $540 annual-equivalent, while Enterprise is quote based. Every plan advertises unlimited app users, but platform resources are not unlimited: DataPages, records, logs, file storage, emails, directories, integration calls and document generation have plan allowances, add-on blocks, overage prices and hard upgrade ceilings.

What Hudson is

Eclipse Hudson is an EPL-licensed Java continuous-integration server designed to run in a servlet container and execute builds from several source-control systems. The Eclipse Foundation now marks the project Archived and lists 3.4.0 from September 2016 as its latest release, so it should be treated as legacy infrastructure to inventory, isolate and migrate—not as a current CI choice.

What Caspio is built to do

Visual application builder

Creates forms, searchable reports, charts and database workflows through DataPages and DataParts.

Hosted relational data

Stores application records and files with plan-specific capacity and logging allowances.

Identity management

Provides directories, two-factor authentication and optional external SAML app connections.

Integration surfaces

Connects external services through REST APIs, webhooks, scheduled import/export and extension agents.

What Hudson is built to do

Java CI server

Historically ran as a Java application in servlet containers such as Tomcat or GlassFish.

SCM integrations

The archived project page lists CVS, Subversion, Git and ClearCase support.

Build execution

Historically executed Ant, Maven, shell-script and Windows batch workloads.

Archived lifecycle

The authoritative project record now identifies Hudson as archived.

Choose Caspio if

• Forms, portals, directories and workflow apps built around structured records
• Projects needing many end users but predictable builder and resource capacity
• Teams that can pilot DataPage, record, API, storage and compliance needs before selecting a plan

Skip Caspio if

• The application requires full source-code ownership or unrestricted infrastructure control
• The budget cannot absorb record, API, storage or compliance add-ons
• Complex real-time UX, offline-native mobile behavior or unusual database semantics dominate the product

Choose Hudson if

• Identifying an existing Hudson server and its historical role
• Planning retirement or migration of legacy Hudson jobs
• Preserving read-only historical context during a controlled transition

Skip Hudson if

• You are selecting a CI platform for a new project
• You require current security fixes, platform support or maintained plugins
• The build system will hold production credentials or run untrusted code

Caspio: pros & cons

• Rapid database apps: Visual tables, forms, reports and workflow components shorten conventional CRUD delivery.
• Unlimited application users: Core plans do not use a simple per-end-user subscription model.
• Hosted operations: Caspio provides the application platform, database hosting and deployed web interfaces.
• Published capacity table: Base allowances, prepaid add-ons, overages and plan ceilings are visible before purchase.
• Unlimited users does not mean unlimited resources: Records, DataPages, storage, calls, emails and logs remain metered or capped.
• Meaningful entry price is substantial: Team starts at $300 month-to-month before optional capacity or compliance charges.
• Portability needs planning: Data can be exported, but a complete Caspio application is tied to proprietary DataPages and platform behavior.
• Security and compliance are tiered: Premium identity, audit, HIPAA/BAA, dedicated resources and governance can require higher or special plans.

Hudson: pros & cons

• Legacy recognition: The official page identifies the runtime, supported build styles and historical SCM integrations for existing installations.
• Open-source history: Eclipse lists the project under the Eclipse Public License 1.0.
• Migration context: Its documented Java servlet-container architecture helps teams locate dependencies around an inherited instance.
• Archived project: Eclipse explicitly marks Hudson archived, so ongoing fixes and current platform compatibility should not be assumed.
• Old release line: The latest release shown by Eclipse is 3.4.0 from 2016.
• Security exposure: An internet-facing or privileged build system without current maintenance creates material dependency, plugin and credential risk.
• Migration work: Jobs, plugins, credentials, agents and artifact flows must be inventoried and tested on a maintained replacement.