Cdnjs vs Gandi
A source-aware comparison of pricing, documented capabilities and workflow fit.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — Cdnjs is free, Gandi is variable pricing.
- How to start: Cdnjs is free, Gandi is variable pricing.
- Where they differ: only Cdnjs has open source / self-hostable; both offer public api.
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. How we score tools.
What Cdnjs is
cdnjs is a free, community-run CDN for open-source web-library assets, delivered through Cloudflare. Consumers select a library, exact version and file, then reference its public URL; the service also exposes library metadata through an API. Example markup published by Cloudflare uses a versioned URL and Subresource Integrity attributes. cdnjs' code repository is MIT-licensed, but each distributed library keeps its own license. It is a dependency-delivery service rather than private storage, a package-security review or a contractual availability guarantee.
What Gandi is
Gandi is an ICANN-oriented domain registrar with a large TLD catalog plus Anycast LiveDNS, DNSSEC, web and email forwarding, WHOIS privacy where registries permit it, an API, SSL and separate email/hosting products. Domain cost is not flat: creation, transfer, renewal, owner change and post-expiry restore differ by extension, country, currency, tax and promotional period. A low first-year price can therefore be far below the recurring renewal price.
Side by side
What Cdnjs is built to do
- Library catalog
- Indexes versioned files from supported open-source JavaScript and CSS libraries.
- Cloudflare delivery
- Serves cached public assets through Cloudflare's network.
- API access
- Exposes library, version and file metadata for discovery and tooling.
- Integrity-ready snippets
- Provides examples and hashes that can be used with browser SRI and crossorigin attributes.
What Gandi is built to do
- Domain lifecycle
- Registers, transfers, renews, changes ownership and restores supported extensions.
- LiveDNS
- Hosts Anycast DNS with DNSSEC, templates, bulk operations and managed record changes.
- Privacy and security
- Offers registry-dependent WHOIS masking, account MFA and domain activity controls.
- API and delegation
- Automates domain/DNS work and delegates scoped permissions through organizations and teams.
Choose Cdnjs if
- Static sites loading a well-known public library at an exact reviewed version
- Documentation and prototypes where a third-party CDN is permitted
- Teams that enforce CSP, verify SRI hashes and retain a self-hosted fallback for critical assets
Skip Cdnjs if
- Assets are private, proprietary or outside the cdnjs library catalog
- Policy forbids third-party asset requests or requires a contractual SLA
- The team cannot review the package license and code or pin an immutable version
Choose Gandi if
- Domain portfolios needing API-driven DNS, templates and delegated administration
- Registrants who compare registration, renewal, transfer and restore cost for each exact TLD
- Teams wanting registrar, DNS, forwarding and optional email/hosting in one account
Skip Gandi if
- The decision uses only a first-year promotion and ignores recurring renewal or restore fees
- The required TLD does not permit the expected privacy, transfer or ownership workflow
- Domain access, recovery contacts, MFA and off-provider DNS exports are not governed
Evidence and freshness
Where a claim on this page comes from a vendor page, it is linked here.
Cdnjs
Official sources reviewed · reviewed 2026-08-24
Gandi
Official sources reviewed · reviewed 2026-08-24
Cdnjs: pros & cons
- No-cost public delivery: Supported open-source library assets are served globally through Cloudflare.
- Versioned paths: URLs can identify an exact library release and file for reproducible front-end loading.
- Integrity metadata: Published examples support browser Subresource Integrity checks when the correct hash is used.
- Open project and API: Public repositories and metadata endpoints make the catalog inspectable and automatable.
- Catalog scope is narrow: It is not private asset storage or a general-purpose origin/CDN product.
- Package trust remains external: CDN availability does not prove that a library release or transitive code is safe.
- Third-party dependency: Page delivery, privacy posture and CSP must account for requests to an external domain.
- Licenses vary: The cdnjs repository license does not replace the license of each hosted library.
Gandi: pros & cons
- Published lifecycle pricing: Gandi exposes creation, transfer, renewal, owner-change and restore prices by TLD.
- Included DNS tooling: LiveDNS provides Anycast nameservers, DNSSEC, templates and record history/rollback capabilities.
- Domain automation: A public API and bulk configuration tools support portfolio administration.
- Privacy controls: WHOIS masking is enabled by default where registry rules allow it, with WebAuthn account MFA available.
- Renewal can dwarf registration: The reviewed .com example was €11 to register and €31.98 to renew before tax in France.
- Promotions are temporary: Registry campaigns, exchange rates and country pricing can change both availability and cost.
- Privacy is not universal: Registry policy, registrant type and jurisdiction can prevent complete WHOIS masking.
- Bundled services have boundaries: Free SSL is described as first-year and hosting/mail products require their own entitlement review.
Our verdict on Cdnjs
cdnjs is a convenient free path for public, versioned web dependencies; use exact versions and valid SRI, review the library's own license and code, and self-host or provide a fallback when availability, privacy or supply-chain control is critical.
Our verdict on Gandi
Gandi can suit operationally serious domain portfolios, but evaluate each TLD over several years; secure account and registry contacts, export DNS records, test API automation, and document renewal, transfer and expiry recovery before moving critical domains.