Fastly vs Gcore
A source-aware comparison of pricing, documented capabilities and workflow fit.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — Fastly is usage-based pricing, Gcore is usage-based pricing.
- How to start: both are usage-based pricing.
- Where they differ: only Fastly has sso (saml); both offer public api.
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. How we score tools.
What Fastly is
Fastly is an edge cloud and CDN with programmable edge compute and very fast cache purging. Instant purge and programmable edge logic are its differentiators: cache invalidation happens in seconds and routing rules run at the edge. It is priced and shaped for teams that treat the CDN as part of the application, not a checkbox.
What Gcore is
Gcore is a proprietary edge and cloud provider with virtual machines, bare metal, managed Kubernetes, containers, functions, storage and networking across a region-dependent footprint. Its current VM page advertises Standard dedicated-vCPU instances from €8.93 per month, free egress and compute billing only while instances are active; prices exclude VAT and vary by location and configuration. The wider cloud calculator shows separate pricing for storage, addresses, load balancers and other services. Pay-as-you-go capacity is available rather than guaranteed, and retained resources must be checked individually when compute stops or is deleted.
Side by side
What Fastly is built to do
- Instant cache purge
- Invalidates cached objects across the network within seconds.
- Edge compute
- Runs custom logic at the edge for routing and personalisation.
- Real-time logging
- Streams request logs to your own systems as they happen.
What Gcore is built to do
- Virtual infrastructure
- Offers shared or dedicated-vCPU virtual machines, GPU options and bare metal in selected regions.
- Container services
- Provides managed Kubernetes and managed container execution with separately billed worker resources and options.
- Storage and networking
- Combines block, file and object storage with IP, load-balancing and edge-network services.
- API automation
- Exposes project- and region-scoped infrastructure actions through authenticated APIs.
Choose Fastly if
- Teams that need control over caching behaviour at the edge.
Choose Gcore if
- Latency-sensitive workloads after testing the exact target Gcore region
- VM or Kubernetes deployments that benefit from eligible included egress
- Teams managing infrastructure through APIs and explicit lifecycle automation
Skip Gcore if
- The budget assumes the advertised starting VM price includes every disk, IP, license and service
- The architecture requires guaranteed on-demand capacity without a suitable committed agreement
- A product-specific SLA or compliance badge is being treated as platform-wide coverage
Evidence and freshness
Where a claim on this page comes from a vendor page, it is linked here.
Gcore
Official sources reviewed · reviewed 2026-08-24
Fastly: pros & cons
- Instant global cache purge
- Programmable edge with VCL and Compute
- Strong performance and observability
- Configuration is developer-oriented
- Pricing suits larger traffic volumes
- Steeper learning curve than simple CDNs
Gcore: pros & cons
- Distributed footprint: Cloud regions and edge-network services can place workloads near geographically diverse users.
- Flexible infrastructure: Virtual machines, bare metal, Kubernetes, containers, functions and storage share one platform.
- Automation support: The control panel, documented API and Terraform-oriented workflows enable repeatable provisioning.
- Active-compute billing: Current VM positioning waives VM compute while stopped and includes egress for eligible VM offers.
- Headline price is conditional: VM family, region, storage, operating system, IPs and VAT change the total.
- Stopped compute is not the whole bill: Persistent storage, snapshots, addresses and adjacent services can remain chargeable.
- Capacity and terms vary: Pay-as-you-go capacity is provided as available, while spot and committed orders have different rules.
- Service-level claims are product-specific: A Kubernetes or Functions SLA must not be assumed to cover every cloud component.
Our verdict on Fastly
Powerful for teams who will use the programmability. Simple static sites do not need it.
Our verdict on Gcore
Gcore is worth testing for globally distributed cloud and edge workloads, but compare the exact region and full resource graph rather than the headline VM rate; confirm capacity and SLA terms, remove retained resources deliberately, and prove backup restoration before production.