Grafana vs New Relic
A source-aware comparison of pricing, documented capabilities and workflow fit.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — Grafana is free tier available, New Relic is free tier available.
- How to start: both are free tier available.
- Where they differ: only Grafana has open source / self-hostable; both offer public api, mobile app and sso (saml).
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. How we score tools.
What Grafana is
Grafana turns metrics, logs and traces into dashboards, and connects to almost any data source. The open-source version is fully capable; the cloud version removes the operational work. Its strength is that it does not own your data: it queries Prometheus, Loki, SQL databases and cloud providers where they already live. That also means Grafana alone is not a monitoring system, and you still have to choose and run the stores behind it.
What New Relic is
New Relic is a full observability platform covering application performance, infrastructure, logs and browser monitoring. The pricing model charges per user and per gigabyte of data ingested. Having traces, logs and metrics in one query language is the argument for it: an alert can be followed from a slow endpoint down to the individual database call without switching products. The cost model rewards discipline about what you send, since ingest volume rather than host count drives the bill.
Side by side
| Grafana | New Relic | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| How to start | Free tiernot a monthly price | Free tiernot a monthly price |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes |
| Open source / self-hostable | Yes | No |
| SSO (SAML) | Yes | Yes |
| Visit | Grafana ↗ | New Relic ↗ |
What Grafana is built to do
- Data-source agnostic
- Queries Prometheus, Loki, SQL and cloud APIs without moving data into Grafana.
- Alerting
- Evaluates rules against queries and routes notifications to external channels.
- Dashboard as code
- Stores dashboards as JSON so they can be versioned and provisioned.
What New Relic is built to do
- Distributed tracing
- Follow one request across services to find where latency is actually spent.
- Unified query language
- Metrics, logs, traces and events queried together instead of in separate tools.
- Real user monitoring
- Browser and mobile timings from actual visitors, not synthetic checks.
- Ingest-based pricing
- Cost follows data volume and seats rather than the number of hosts.
Choose Grafana if
- Any team that needs to see what its systems are doing, from one server to a large fleet.
Choose New Relic if
- Teams that want application, infrastructure and log monitoring from a single vendor.
Evidence and freshness
Where a claim on this page comes from a vendor page, it is linked here.
Grafana: pros & cons
- Connects to dozens of data sources out of the box
- Open source and self-hostable
- Alerting built into the same tool as the dashboards
- Dashboard design takes real effort to get right
- Cloud pricing scales with data volume
- Configuration sprawl on large teams
New Relic: pros & cons
- Broad coverage in one product
- Generous free data allowance
- Strong application tracing
- Data-volume pricing can escalate without warning
- Interface is dense and takes learning
- Per-user pricing discourages wide access
Our verdict on Grafana
The default choice for dashboards, and rightly so. Budget time for building the dashboards, not just installing it.
Our verdict on New Relic
Capable and complete. Watch the ingest bill: teams are far more often surprised by cost here than by capability.