iTerm2 vs Sourcegraph
The ultimate side-by-side head-to-head analysis for 2026.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — iTerm2 is free, Sourcegraph is free tier available.
- How to start: iTerm2 is free, Sourcegraph is free tier available.
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. We do not publish a quality score, because we do not have one we can stand behind. They cannot tell you which tool fits your workflow — the sections below are there for that. How we score tools.
iTerm2
Sourcegraph
Category
Developer Tools
Developer Tools
Base Price
Free
Free tier
Public API
No
Yes
Mobile app
No
No
Open source / self-hostable
Yes
Yes
SSO (SAML)
No
Yes
Choose iTerm2 if:
Mac users who spend real time in a terminal.
Choose Sourcegraph if:
Engineering organisations with enough repositories that finding code is a daily problem.
iTerm2: pros & cons
- Free and mature
- Split panes and session restore
- Deeply configurable
- macOS only
- Configuration surface is large
- Interface is functional rather than modern
Sourcegraph: pros & cons
- Search that actually works across many repositories
- Follows definitions across service boundaries
- Batch changes across repos
- Priced for larger engineering organisations
- Self-hosting is a real deployment
- Overkill for a handful of repos
Our verdict on iTerm2
The long-standing default on macOS, and still free. Newer terminals win on polish, not capability.
Our verdict on Sourcegraph
Genuinely valuable past a certain repo count. Below that, your editor's search is enough.