Keycloak vs Sourcegraph
The ultimate side-by-side head-to-head analysis for 2026.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — Keycloak is free, Sourcegraph is free tier available.
- How to start: Keycloak is free, Sourcegraph is free tier available.
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. We do not publish a quality score, because we do not have one we can stand behind. They cannot tell you which tool fits your workflow — the sections below are there for that. How we score tools.
Keycloak
Sourcegraph
Category
Developer Tools
Developer Tools
Base Price
Free
Free tier
Public API
Yes
Yes
Mobile app
No
No
Open source / self-hostable
Yes
Yes
SSO (SAML)
Yes
Yes
Choose Keycloak if:
Organisations that need enterprise identity without a per-user bill.
Choose Sourcegraph if:
Engineering organisations with enough repositories that finding code is a daily problem.
Keycloak: pros & cons
- Full identity server at no licence cost
- Standards support including SAML and OIDC
- Complete control over user data
- Operating it is a real responsibility
- Administration console is dense
- Upgrades need care
Sourcegraph: pros & cons
- Search that actually works across many repositories
- Follows definitions across service boundaries
- Batch changes across repos
- Priced for larger engineering organisations
- Self-hosting is a real deployment
- Overkill for a handful of repos
Our verdict on Keycloak
The serious open-source answer to Auth0. Budget for the operations, because the licence saving is not free.
Our verdict on Sourcegraph
Genuinely valuable past a certain repo count. Below that, your editor's search is enough.