Lever vs Paylocity
A source-aware comparison of pricing, documented capabilities and workflow fit.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — Lever is pricing not verified, Paylocity is pricing not verified.
- How to start: both are pricing not verified.
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. How we score tools.
What Lever is
Lever combines applicant tracking and candidate relationship management with recruiting automation, analytics and integrations. Pricing is customized by company size, hiring volume, features, integrations and support; API and requisition capabilities vary by package and integration model.
What Paylocity is
Paylocity provides US payroll and HR with self-service and workforce management features.
Side by side
| Lever | Paylocity | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | HR Software | HR Software |
| How to start | Not verifiednot a monthly price | Not verifiednot a monthly price |
| Public API | Yes | not checked |
| Mobile app | No | not checked |
| Open source / self-hostable | No | not checked |
| SSO (SAML) | Yes | not checked |
| Visit | Lever ↗ | Paylocity ↗ |
What Lever is built to do
- Applicant tracking
- Manages postings, applications, candidate stages, interviews, feedback and offers.
- Recruiting CRM
- Builds talent pools and nurture workflows for prospects and previous applicants.
- Automation and analytics
- Provides configurable recruiting workflows and pipeline reporting.
- APIs and webhooks
- Connects job sites, HR systems and recruiting partners with package-specific access.
Choose Lever if
- Teams sourcing and nurturing prospects in addition to processing applicants
- Recruiting operations that need configurable stages, feedback and offers
- Organizations whose required integrations are included in the selected Lever package
Skip Lever if
- You require public fixed pricing before product scoping
- A needed requisition, API, webhook or partner integration is outside your package
- Your team lacks controls for candidate-data access, integration credentials and migration
Choose Paylocity if
- US companies wanting payroll and HR from one vendor.
Evidence and freshness
Where a claim on this page comes from a vendor page, it is linked here.
Lever
Official sources reviewed · reviewed 2026-08-24
Paylocity
Sources have not been attached to this record yet.
Lever: pros & cons
- ATS and CRM together: Tracks active applicants while maintaining and nurturing broader candidate pipelines.
- Recruiting workflows: Supports job posting, scheduling, feedback, approvals and offers.
- Candidate campaigns: CRM features can organize, rediscover and contact prospects or past applicants.
- Integration interfaces: Provides Data API, Postings API, webhooks and an OAuth partner process.
- Quote-based pricing: Cost depends on organization and selected product, integration and support scope.
- Package gates: Requisitions, legacy API keys, manual webhooks and some integrations require specific packages or features.
- Credential sensitivity: API keys and webhook signing tokens can expose candidate and recruiting data.
- Migration work: Moving from another ATS requires field, file, history and cutover decisions.
Paylocity: pros & cons
- Solid US payroll and tax handling
- Employee self-service reduces HR load
- Workforce management included
- US only
- Implementation takes time
- Support quality varies by account
Our verdict on Lever
Choose Lever when the combined ATS and CRM workflow matches how your team recruits; validate package gates, data migration and every integration credential before signing.
Our verdict on Paylocity
A dependable US payroll choice. Irrelevant outside the US.