Mattermost vs Rocket.Chat
A source-aware comparison of pricing, documented capabilities and workflow fit.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — Mattermost is free tier available, Rocket.Chat is free tier available.
- How to start: both are free tier available.
- Where they differ: on what we checked they match — both offer public api, mobile app, open source / self-hostable and sso (saml).
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. How we score tools.
What Mattermost is
Mattermost is team messaging you can run on your own infrastructure, with a Slack-like interface and strong compliance features. Self-hosting is the entire point: message history stays on servers you control, which is what makes it viable for defence, healthcare and regulated finance where a hosted chat service is simply not permitted. The interface is close enough to Slack that migration costs little in training, and the source is open, so the deployment cannot be discontinued from outside.
What Rocket.Chat is
Rocket.Chat is open-source team messaging that can be self-hosted, including in restricted environments. It runs in environments where hosted chat is not allowed at all, including air-gapped networks, which is its clearest reason to exist. In exchange you operate it, and the polish gap against hosted rivals is visible.
Side by side
| Mattermost | Rocket.Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Communication |
| How to start | Free tiernot a monthly price | Free tiernot a monthly price |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes |
| Open source / self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| SSO (SAML) | Yes | Yes |
| Visit | Mattermost ↗ | Rocket.Chat ↗ |
What Mattermost is built to do
- Self-hosted
- Runs on your own servers or private cloud, with message data never leaving them.
- Open source
- The server is open source, so a deployment cannot be withdrawn by a vendor.
- Compliance export
- Legal hold, audit logging and export formats built for regulated environments.
- Familiar interface
- Channels, threads and integrations close enough to Slack to keep training short.
What Rocket.Chat is built to do
- Self-hosted messaging
- Runs the whole chat platform on your own infrastructure.
- Federation and bridges
- Connects to other chat networks and protocols.
- Compliance controls
- Applies retention, audit and data residency policies locally.
Choose Mattermost if
- Organisations that cannot put internal conversations on a third-party service.
Choose Rocket.Chat if
- Organisations that must keep messaging on their own infrastructure.
Evidence and freshness
Where a claim on this page comes from a vendor page, it is linked here.
Mattermost
Open source, free — vendor page verified · reviewed 2026-09-03
Mattermost: pros & cons
- Fully self-hostable, including in air-gapped environments
- Familiar channel-based interface
- Open source core
- Ecosystem of integrations is smaller than Slack's
- You carry the upgrade and backup burden
- Mobile apps lag behind commercial rivals
Rocket.Chat: pros & cons
- Fully self-hostable and open source
- Omnichannel customer messaging included
- Highly customisable
- Setup and maintenance are on you
- Interface less refined than commercial rivals
- Mobile apps have rough edges
Our verdict on Mattermost
The right call when self-hosting is non-negotiable. Otherwise the convenience gap with hosted chat is wide.
Our verdict on Rocket.Chat
Strong when self-hosting is required. Otherwise commercial chat is less work.