Penpot vs Weebly
A source-aware comparison of pricing, documented capabilities and workflow fit.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — Penpot is free, Weebly is free tier available.
- How to start: Penpot is free, Weebly is free tier available.
- Where they differ: only Penpot has public api and open source / self-hostable.
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. How we score tools.
What Penpot is
Penpot is an open-source design and prototyping tool that runs in the browser and can be self-hosted.
What Weebly is
Weebly is Square's classic drag-and-drop hosted site builder, distinct from the newer Square Online editor. It provides a free tier and region-priced Personal, Professional and Performance plans; the storefront viewed from Turkey currently shows paid annual prices from €11 per month. Plans vary in custom-domain, branding, statistics, support and commerce features. More importantly, Square has announced that Weebly service will wind down in 67 countries including Turkey: new-page publishing ends June 29, 2026, existing sites are scheduled to be unpublished September 27, 2026, and account access ends December 26, 2026. Buyers in affected countries should migrate, not start a new dependency.
Side by side
What Weebly is built to do
- Classic site editor
- Builds responsive informational sites and blogs using themes and drag-and-drop elements.
- Hosted publishing
- Includes managed hosting, SSL and tier-dependent custom domains and branding controls.
- Commerce
- Offers catalog, cart, inventory and tier-dependent shipping, review and abandoned-cart features.
- Partial exports
- Exports a static site archive plus separate product, order and contact data, with important omissions.
Choose Penpot if
- Teams that need design collaboration without a per-seat contract, or with data residency rules.
Choose Weebly if
- Low-complexity informational sites in countries where service remains supported
- Existing owners maintaining a classic Weebly site while preparing an export and migration
- Short-lived prototypes that do not require portable application logic or a complete restorable backup
Skip Weebly if
- The owner or business is in Turkey or another announced wind-down country
- A complete export-and-import migration path is required
- The project needs Square Online's current commerce workflow, advanced design control or enterprise identity governance
Evidence and freshness
Where a claim on this page comes from a vendor page, it is linked here.
Weebly
Official sources reviewed · reviewed 2026-08-24
Penpot: pros & cons
- Open source with no seat licence
- Self-hostable, so files stay yours
- Uses open web standards under the hood
- Fewer plugins and integrations
- Performance lags on very large files
- Smaller community for help
Weebly: pros & cons
- The classic editor remains approachable for basic informational sites and blogs.
- Free hosting, SSL and a Weebly subdomain lower the barrier for eligible-region experiments.
- Paid tiers add custom domains, greater customization, support and commerce functions.
- Site, product, order and contact exports provide partial migration and record-retention paths.
- Service is being withdrawn from 67 countries, including Turkey, on a published 2026 timetable.
- Weebly and Square Online are different editors and account/product paths; capabilities do not transfer automatically between them.
- The site archive is not a restorable Weebly backup and excludes blog and store pages; forms and slideshows may not work outside the platform.
- Plan prices and payment capabilities are regional, while transaction-processing fees remain separate from the website subscription.
Our verdict on Penpot
The credible open-source answer to Figma. Judge it on your file sizes before committing a team to it.
Our verdict on Weebly
Weebly can still serve simple sites in supported markets, but the country wind-down dominates the decision. In Turkey it is not a sensible new platform choice; export content, store/order/contact data and domains early, then verify the replacement before the published access deadlines.