Chatwoot vs UserVoice
A source-aware comparison of pricing, documented capabilities and workflow fit.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — Chatwoot is free tier available, UserVoice is pricing not verified.
- How to start: Chatwoot is free tier available, UserVoice is pricing not verified.
- Where they differ: on what we checked they match — both offer public api.
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. How we score tools.
What Chatwoot is
Chatwoot centralizes supported website, email, messaging, social and API channels in shared inboxes. It is available as Chatwoot Cloud or a self-hosted codebase, but enterprise features and the operational burden differ across editions.
What UserVoice is
UserVoice collects product feedback and feature requests, letting customers vote and product teams see demand.
Side by side
| Chatwoot | UserVoice | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Customer Service | Customer Service |
| How to start | Free tiernot a monthly price | Not verifiednot a monthly price |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | not checked |
| Open source / self-hostable | Yes | not checked |
| SSO (SAML) | Yes | not checked |
| Visit | Chatwoot ↗ | UserVoice ↗ |
What Chatwoot is built to do
- Shared inboxes
- Routes conversations from supported channels to assigned agents and teams.
- Website and messaging channels
- Connects live chat, email, WhatsApp, SMS, social and other documented providers.
- API channel
- Allows a custom application or unsupported messaging source to create an inbox.
- Cloud or self-hosted
- Offers managed subscriptions and multiple infrastructure deployment methods.
Choose Chatwoot if
- Teams consolidating supported chat, email and messaging channels
- Organizations with infrastructure staff and a requirement to host conversation data
- Custom support channels that can integrate through Chatwoot's API inbox
Skip Chatwoot if
- You expect Community Edition to include enterprise SSO, SLA and advanced controls
- Your team cannot operate and update the required self-hosted services
- A required external channel or retention period is absent from your selected cloud plan
Choose UserVoice if
- Product teams drowning in feature requests from customers.
Evidence and freshness
Where a claim on this page comes from a vendor page, it is linked here.
Chatwoot
Official sources reviewed · reviewed 2026-08-24
UserVoice
Sources have not been attached to this record yet.
Chatwoot: pros & cons
- Self-hosting path: Community code outside the enterprise directory is MIT-licensed.
- Channel coverage: Supports live chat, email and multiple messaging or social providers.
- Custom channel API: Connects unsupported applications through an API inbox.
- Deployment choice: Use the managed cloud or operate Chatwoot on your infrastructure.
- Self-hosting stack: Production requires web and worker processes, PostgreSQL, Redis, email and object storage.
- Edition boundaries: Community Edition excludes SSO, SLA policies and several enterprise controls.
- Cloud tier limits: Channels, automation, retention and conversation quotas vary by plan.
- Provider setup: External messaging channels require their own credentials, permissions and sometimes provider charges.
UserVoice: pros & cons
- Customer voting surfaces real demand
- Keeps requests out of support inboxes
- Closes the loop with requesters
- Loudest customers are not always right
- Priced above simple feedback boards
- Public roadmaps invite expectations
Our verdict on Chatwoot
Choose Chatwoot after comparing cloud-plan limits with the real cost of operating its full self-hosted stack; open source does not make every enterprise feature free.
Our verdict on UserVoice
Useful for structure. Voting is a signal, not a roadmap.