Crisp vs UserVoice
A source-aware comparison of pricing, documented capabilities and workflow fit.
Short answer
- Price: not directly comparable — Crisp is free tier available, UserVoice is pricing not verified.
- How to start: Crisp is free tier available, UserVoice is pricing not verified.
- Where they differ: on what we checked they match — both offer public api.
These lines are generated from the pricing we track, not from a paid placement. How we score tools.
What Crisp is
Crisp provides live chat, a shared inbox and a knowledge base with a low flat price rather than per-seat billing.
What UserVoice is
UserVoice collects product feedback and feature requests, letting customers vote and product teams see demand.
Side by side
| Crisp | UserVoice | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Customer Service | Customer Service |
| How to start | Free tiernot a monthly price | Not verifiednot a monthly price |
| Public API | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | not checked |
| Open source / self-hostable | No | not checked |
| SSO (SAML) | Yes | not checked |
| Visit | Crisp ↗ | UserVoice ↗ |
Choose Crisp if
- Small teams that want live chat without per-seat pricing.
Choose UserVoice if
- Product teams drowning in feature requests from customers.
Evidence and freshness
Where a claim on this page comes from a vendor page, it is linked here.
UserVoice
Sources have not been attached to this record yet.
Crisp: pros & cons
- Flat pricing instead of per agent
- Chat, inbox and help centre together
- Chatbot included
- Fewer integrations than larger platforms
- Reporting is basic
- Support quality varies
UserVoice: pros & cons
- Customer voting surfaces real demand
- Keeps requests out of support inboxes
- Closes the loop with requesters
- Loudest customers are not always right
- Priced above simple feedback boards
- Public roadmaps invite expectations
Our verdict on Crisp
Good value at small scale. Bigger support operations outgrow the reporting.
Our verdict on UserVoice
Useful for structure. Voting is a signal, not a roadmap.