ToolCompare
← Back to the Mailchimp review

Best Mailchimp alternatives in 2026

These are the 6 closest tools to Mailchimp that we track, ordered by what they cost to start. Each entry says how its pricing differs from Mailchimp's — based on the numbers we hold, not on who pays us. We do not publish a quality score, because we do not have one we can stand behind.

Of the 6 alternatives on this page, 3 publish a price we could verify. The cheapest paid step among them is MailerLite at $12/mo, against $13/mo for Mailchimp — $1 less per month. 2 of them publish a free plan (ConvertKit, MailerLite).

Why people leave Mailchimp

These are the drawbacks listed in our own Mailchimp review — not complaints we invented for this page.

  1. GetResponse

    Email marketing platform.

    vs Mailchimp: pricier to start ($19/mo billed monthly vs $13/mo).

    First paid step: Starter at $19/mo billed monthly

    Why switch to GetResponse

    • Unlimited monthly email sends on every paid plan
    • Course creator, webinars and website builder on the Creator tier

    What you give up

    • Starter allows only one automation workflow

    Best for: Small businesses and creators running email marketing plus paid content.

    Mailchimp vs GetResponse →Visit GetResponse →

  2. ActiveCampaign

    Pro automation & CRM.

    vs Mailchimp: pricier to start ($29/mo vs $13/mo).

    Why switch to ActiveCampaign

    • Infinite Automation: If you can imagine a marketing funnel, you can build it here.
    • Integrated CRM: Seamlessly move leads from your email list to your sales pipeline.

    What you give up

    • Steep Learning Curve: The sheer power of the tool takes time and training to master.

    Best for: E-commerce Businesses and Advanced Marketing Teams.

    Visit ActiveCampaign →

  3. Braze

    Enterprise customer-engagement platform for instrumented, cross-channel lifecycle messaging and journey orchestration.

    vs Mailchimp: priced differently (Quote only vs $13/mo).

    Why switch to Braze

    • Combines real-time profile and event data with segmentation, campaigns and journey orchestration.
    • SDK and REST API paths support mobile, web and server-side data and messaging integrations.

    What you give up

    • No public price: MAU volume, edition, channels, credits, data and services require a scoped quote.

    Best for: Product-led and consumer brands with meaningful mobile or web audiences, engineering support and mature lifecycle-marketing operations.

    Visit Braze →

  4. Brevo

    Email, SMS and marketing automation.

    vs Mailchimp: priced differently (Free tier vs $13/mo).

    Why switch to Brevo

    • Pricing by send volume, not list size
    • SMS and email in one platform

    What you give up

    • Deliverability trails premium providers

    Best for: Small businesses with large lists who send occasionally.

    Visit Brevo →

  5. ConvertKit

    Email for creators.

    vs Mailchimp: priced differently (Free tier vs $13/mo).

    First paid step: Creator at $33/user/mo

    Why switch to ConvertKit

    • Simple Automations: The most intuitive visual funnel builder in the market.
    • Creator Network: Benefit from an internal network of other creators who can recommend you.

    What you give up

    • Basic Editor: Its email designer is very minimalist and not meant for highly visual layouts.

    Best for: Blogger, YouTubers, and Professional Creators.

    Mailchimp vs ConvertKit →Visit ConvertKit →

  6. MailerLite

    Email marketing with a generous free tier.

    vs Mailchimp: cheaper to start ($12/mo vs $13/mo).

    First paid step: Comfort at $12/mo

    Why switch to MailerLite

    • Free tier that small senders can live on
    • Clean, quick editor

    What you give up

    • Approval process rejects some accounts

    Best for: Creators and small businesses starting an email list.

    Mailchimp vs MailerLite →Visit MailerLite →

Some links on this page earn us a commission if you sign up. It never changes a price you pay, a verdict we publish, or the order tools appear in.